Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Vélez-Pareja and Tham, 2003a, Vélez-Pareja and Tham, 2003b and Tham and Vélez-Pareja, 2004 showed the matching between discounted cash flow (DCF) methods and value added methods. They departed from the net operating profit less adjusted taxes NOPLAT and net income when using market values to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010762967
En Vélez-Pareja y Tham (2003), se presentó la forma de hacer coincidir los métodos de valor agregado (utilidad económica (UE) (Residual Income Method, RIM) y el valor económico agregado (VEA) (Economic Value Added, EVA)) y los métodos de flujo de caja descontado (discounted cash flow,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010762996
Two measures of excess profit (residual income) are currently available in the literature: the standard one, of which Economic Value Added (EVA) (Stewart, 1991) is a major instantiation, and Systemic Value Added (SVA) (Magni, 2003, 2004, 2005), also named lost-capital residual income (Magni,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010763015
There are methods to match value added approaches (Residual Income Method, RIM and Economic Value Added, EVA) with discounted cash flow methods, DCF. In this note we use a real life case from an emerging country to illustrate the matching, with complexities such as unpaid taxes, losses carried...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010763018
En Vélez-Pareja y Tham (2001), presentamos diferentes maneras de valorar los flujos de caja. Primero se utilizó el costo promedio ponderado de capital (CPPC) (Weighted Average Cost of Capital, WACC) para descontar el flujo de caja libre (FCL). Segundo, se descontó el FCL con el WACC ajustado....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011031625