Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Shares with more voting rights than cash flow rights provide their owners with a disproportional influence that is often found to destroy the value of outside equity. This is taken as evidence of discretionary use of power. However, concentration of power does not necessarily result from control...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008764025
We contrast the performance consequences of intra-family vs. external ownership transfers. Investigating a sample of …-family transfers. We attribute these performance differences to the long-term orientation of family firms passed on to the next … and theoretical mechanisms explaining performance differences, we outline implications for family business and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009246580
investment performance we used a measure of marginal q which measures the ratio of the investment returns to cost of capital …. Institutional owners are found to have had a positive effect on performance, with a marginally diminishing effect of institutional … performance, eradicating the positive influence of institutional ownership. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011095552
performance is analyzed. Since the data is collected as repeated cross sections and firms are not identified over time, the … decisive role in survival of firms and their employment growth as well. Moreover, survival and performance of firms are …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005642438
performance. To measure investment performance Mueller and Reardon’s (1993) marginal q is used, although derived directly from … both domestic and foreign institutional owners positively influence firm performance. Furthermore a non-linear relation … between institutional ownership concentration and performance is found. This is consistent with positive incentive effects and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005642441