Showing 1 - 6 of 6
This paper investigates the robustness of hindsight bias in experimental asset markets, the time invariance of the different experimental risk elicitation methods of certainty equivalents and binary lottery choices, and their correspondence.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005850581
This paper investigates (i) the robustness of hindsight bias in experimental assetmarkets, (ii) the time invariance of the different experimental risk elicitationmethods of certainty equivalents and binary lottery choices, and (iii) their correspondence.The results of our within-subjects...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005867042
In this paper we relate individual risk attitude as elicited by binary lotteries and certainty equivalents to market behavior. By analyzing 26 independent markets with a total of 280 participants we show that binary lottery choices and certainty equivalents are poorly correlated. Only lottery...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014087733
(...) We provide support for the disposition effect. Participants who experience a gain sell their assets more rapidly than participants who experience a loss, and positively framed subjects generally sell their assets later than negatively framed subjects.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005844862
The results of an asset market experiment, in which 64 subjects trade two assets oneight markets in a computerized continuous double auction, indicate that objectivelyirrelevant information influences trading behavior. Moreover, positively and negativelyframed information leads to a particular...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866816
In this paper we investigate four hypotheses which are inconsistent with expected utility theory, but may well be explained by prospect theory. It deals with framing, the non-linearity of subjective probabilities, the disposition effect, and the correspondence of different experimental risk...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009613618