Do Econometric Models Provide More Accurate Forecasts When They are More Conservative? A Test of Political Economy Models for Forecasting Elections
Year of publication: |
2017
|
---|---|
Authors: | Graefe, Andreas |
Other Persons: | Green, Kesten C. (contributor) ; Armstrong, J. Scott (contributor) |
Publisher: |
[2017]: [S.l.] : SSRN |
Subject: | Schätzung | Estimation | Prognoseverfahren | Forecasting model | Theorie | Theory | Wahlverhalten | Voting behaviour |
Extent: | 1 Online-Ressource (25 p) |
---|---|
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments August 11, 2015 erstellt |
Other identifiers: | 10.2139/ssrn.3063275 [DOI] |
Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
-
The 2016 Pollyvote Popular Vote Forecast : A Preliminary Analysis
Graefe, Andreas, (2016)
-
Graefe, Andreas, (2019)
-
Political stock markets and unreliable polls
Bohm, Peter, (1999)
- More ...
-
Golden Rule of Forecasting: Be conservative
Armstrong, J. Scott, (2014)
-
Methods to Elicit Forecasts from Groups: Delphi and Prediction Markets Compared
Green, Kesten C., (2007)
-
Predictive validity of evidence-based persuasion principles : an application of the index method
Armstrong, Jon Scott, (2016)
- More ...